Back to forum.wakfu.com

By continuing to browse this website, you consent to the use of cookies, which enable us to offer you customised content and to collect site-visit statistics. Click on this link for more information on cookies, and to customise your cookie preferences. X

No flash

Merriden's profile
Statistics
Member Since : 2012-01-07
974 Posts (0.59 per day)
Most active in : General Discussion
posté August 12, 2016, 20:11:19 | #1

Quote (Madd1 @ 12 August 2016 17:13) *
After the dev communication we received in Discord yesterday it is VERY clear that the old Mobile Arena's will never return. The devs have changed to the point where no one who worked on the original Mobile Arena's is left at the company, and the work is likely scrapped or lost.

It would represent a full from scratch project for the team which just doesn't make any kind of logistic sense at this stage. There were implications that a similar conceptual system is in the works and coming.

It's very easy to forget that devs have cycled over relatively heavily and many devs who worked on old features are just no longer at the company.

This is the best response.


Thread : General Discussion  Preview message : #975345  Replies : 16  Views : 735
posté August 12, 2016, 19:59:10 | #2
Sorry the .gif is short.

 


Thread : General Discussion  Preview message : #975342  Replies : 102  Views : 3936
posté August 11, 2016, 22:01:57 | #3

Quote (saphiLC @ 11 August 2016 20:47) *

Quote (Merriden @ 11 August 2016 20:28) *
Yooooooooooooooooooo

If I'm understanding what I'm seeing, then!!!

In your new inventory, you can find gear that is on ANY of your account's characters and equip it.

For example, I log onto my Sacrier. I click on her cloak, and it opens up a list of all the cloaks stored in each of my character's inventories. From there, I can click on any of those capes and my Sacrier can equip it, even if it was equipped on one of the other characters.

Yes the new inventory looks like a cluttered mess, but if this will spare everyone from seeing me log in-out-in-out-in-out as I repeatedly swap characters for the sake of rearranging their inventories, then I welcome this change wholeheartedly.
thats the theory, in beta doesnt work, it basically makes all ur gear dissapear in a void of nothingness :p

I noticed, but it comes back when you relog, luckily. xD


Thread : General Discussion  Preview message : #975245  Replies : 102  Views : 3936
posté August 11, 2016, 20:28:34 | #4
Yooooooooooooooooooo

If I'm understanding what I'm seeing, then!!!

In your new inventory, you can find gear that is on ANY of your account's characters and equip it.

For example, I log onto my Sacrier. I click on her cloak, and it opens up a list of all the cloaks stored in each of my character's inventories. From there, I can click on any of those capes and my Sacrier can equip it, even if it was equipped on one of the other characters.

Yes the new inventory looks like a cluttered mess, but if this will spare everyone from seeing me log in-out-in-out-in-out as I repeatedly swap characters for the sake of rearranging their inventories, then I welcome this change wholeheartedly.


Thread : General Discussion  Preview message : #975228  Replies : 102  Views : 3936
posté August 09, 2016, 03:21:45 | #5
This is evil even by Ankama's rock-bottom standards.




Thread : General Discussion  Preview message : #975023  Replies : 18  Views : 937
posté August 09, 2016, 03:17:39 | #6
Like

The sprite for the portal is MIA or something.

Just right click on the stack of books on the ground level and there you go.


Thread : General Discussion  Preview message : #975020  Replies : 2  Views : 155
posté August 04, 2016, 19:16:23 | #7
"Certain things may not please everyone, but at least you won't be able to say we've been sitting around doing nothing."

Hmm... where have I heard that one before...?

Oh, right.

 


Thread : News  Preview message : #974633  Replies : 99  Views : 2142
posté August 04, 2016, 02:16:21 | #8

Quote (treevamp1 @ 04 August 2016 01:56) *
buildings are just too awkward and big.

This. The first time I saw a seed catapult I was like, "who parked this viking longship here".

You can't even go inside it!


Thread : General Discussion  Preview message : #974553  Replies : 8  Views : 374
posté August 03, 2016, 03:47:48 | #9

Quote (Gelgy @ 03 August 2016 03:31) *
Sadly I'm pretty sure the dates under our names are in a Year - Day - Month format. Dunno why! But it means we both have accounts from September of 2012, not January. Given the ambiguity of the formatting, I wish they used month names instead of numbers.

It's year - month - day.


Thread : General Discussion  Preview message : #974442  Replies : 41  Views : 1424
posté August 03, 2016, 00:34:45 | #10

Quote (saphiLC @ 03 August 2016 00:18) *

Quote (Gelgy @ 02 August 2016 23:38) *
The problem is in your reading comprehension.

In order to qualify you must meet both conditions.

The fact that you're eager to misread things in whatever way possible to confuse yourself doesn't make this a problem. Yes, the "since 2012" part might SEEM to imply that any 2012 account qualifies, but it's clear by the full rules that they're referring to the game's launch. So there's no need to get upset if you don't have an account from beta, or from the month of launch.
i do know what she meant, but why the hell say "since 2012" if its not true, thats my point. is not like i give a damn about a stupid cheap title, but sabi always does this kind of things...

Don't thumb down people for trying to make you see reason, saphiLC.

There is absolutely nothing incorrect about saying that an account created before March 2012 has existed "since" 2012.


Thread : General Discussion  Preview message : #974432  Replies : 41  Views : 1424
posté August 02, 2016, 22:31:03 | #11

Quote (saphiLC @ 02 August 2016 22:27) *

Quote (Merriden @ 02 August 2016 21:32) *
It's not contradictory...

There are two conditions for the title. Account created before 1st of March 2012, and logged in at least once in July of 2016.
Sabi said "(who have been playing since 2012)", july is still 2012 yet i cant get the title, that's contradictory. I know it says later that only before 1 march, but then why say if we play since 2012... 2012 is not only 4 months. Thats why im asking wich one is true, accounts created in 2012 or before 1st march, Sabi always end up making confusing posts.

wow.


Thread : General Discussion  Preview message : #974416  Replies : 41  Views : 1424
posté August 02, 2016, 21:32:52 | #12
It's not contradictory...

There are two conditions for the title. Account created before 1st of March 2012, and logged in at least once in July of 2016.


Thread : General Discussion  Preview message : #974405  Replies : 41  Views : 1424
posté August 02, 2016, 20:03:35 | #13
...I can't tell if I'm confused or if it's the other posters in this thread who are confused.

As far as I could understand, Delaz is saying that although this account he's posting with was made in 2014, he is actually a much older player, and as such deserves the title. However, since he doesn't play on his original account anymore due to an involuntary account transfer from some time ago, he will not be receiving the title. (Or will receive it on an an account that he no longer plays with.)

Seems like he's frustrated that he's entitled to the reward but can't prove his entitlement in the eyes of Ankama. Is that about the size of it?

o 3o


Thread : Technical Issues  Preview message : #974401  Replies : 15  Views : 672
posté August 02, 2016, 19:32:58 | #14

Quote (Xnub @ 02 August 2016 14:42) *
Hatespawn what 6 classes do you usually run with?

He uses Heroes on that account and then parties with several other players.


Thread : General Discussion  Preview message : #974400  Replies : 20  Views : 1051
posté August 02, 2016, 03:31:16 | #15
Genuinely wish I could give you mine. I won't be using it.


Thread : Technical Issues  Preview message : #974357  Replies : 15  Views : 672