That's your decision of course. Though keep in mind that leaving the discussion will make it harder for you to voice whatever you want to say to us.
That still leaves more than 50%. Reavers had 122 votes. Bersa had 53. I think 110 votes still pretty much did the trick here. Aside from this, I'm also looking forward to the new political system, in which I hope it's not possible anymore to abuse alts in voting. I still want to thank you for contributing in that way, though.
But you're 'ranting' against an Amaknian economy, the way I see it. You're contributing to Bonta's economy. The markets are a two-way street. More in Bonta means less in Amakna and vice versa. In my honest and personal opinion, if you really cared, you would do everything in your might to trade in Amakna, and get as many people as possible with you. Which you can, since you can be influential, and I think you know that, too.
It has been going on and off, because we also wanted to listen to the minority of people who disliked the war. It wouldn't have gone off if we didn't hear you! I noted down the developments in Excel and Word, and this is what has been going on the past few weeks:
1) Our economy was pretty bad, we started the war
2) Our economy doubled, nearly tripled
3) We had a few complaints about the war and were aware of the disadvantages, so we made a truce with Bonta, after one week of war
4) Our economy went down again like crazy, items for sale back to 200 and even below, and almost no haven bags left in Crusty Road, after a week truce
5) We got tons of complaints because the economy went down again - people wanted the war back
And so we declared war again. Now, we've had 3 weeks of continued war, indeed.
It would seem unfair to put the minority over the majority, but because we value everyone as an individual, we tried! And we now have proof that the war was good to our economy. We've been testing our methods, if it would'nt work, we wouldn't do it. Please check out the statistics again for information about the influence of a truce on our economy.
Nanners, I do agree with you on that we're not achieving an economy as good as Bonta. Bonta just simply has a larger player base, and we don't need to have the best economy of the universe, you're right. (Althought having that as goal in mind wouldn't do harm, I think ;D). But for now we just want to stay with our feet on the ground and uphold a good economy for Amakna, so yeah, you're pretty much right about that ^^
@ Azalon Stonebound
Thanks for voicing your opinion on the forums, too.
Of course not There's a limit placed by the game, and that's just inconvenient. You're selling in Amakna first and that's awesome.
Reavers and I are looking into that now too. Trying to get that done asap, it's a great idea for the ecosystem
Thanks for your support and for selling in Amakna too.
This post has been edited by LadyRinsun - December 07, 2016, 13:28:22.