[Devblog] Wakfu vs. Stasis |
[Devblog] Wakfu vs. Stasis |
|
|
5 Jun 2009, 18:10
| #1
[Devblog] Wakfu vs. Stasis
Yeeeeha ! My first post in the devblog!
I’m blushing all over! Right, let’s be serious now, and get down to the business in hand. I’ve come to talk to you about recent developments and I know you’ve been waiting to hear about them for a while. We can’t wait to get your feedback as they’re subjects we care greatly about. As everything has to start somewhere, let’s start at the beginning. At the heart of Wakfu there are areas where the flora and fauna flourishes more-or-less peacefully. We’d noticed that the edges of these areas were rather quiet. Sometimes they sheltered little heavens-on-earth, earthly paradises created in minute detail by the inhabitants of Astrub, where monsters could live their cushy lives, their numbers only reduced by the occasional raid organized by those very same Astrubians. Back in Astrub, the sound of the wind in the trees had been replaced by the cries of travelling merchants going about their business. They used the resources they’d harvested to craft various objects. Hmmm. I don’t think I’ve forgotten anything. Yeah, so, all that is very nice, but what does it really change? Er, what? Ah, the ecosystem! You’re a real bunch of geniuses, aren’t you? Yes, the ecosystem. It’s the ‘little jewel’ we hand over to you that you can do whatever you want with. But ultimately, when I want to scythe down a field, or plant a bunch of seeds, or chase a group of monsters, I don’t really appreciate the impact I’m having. I’ve already received an ear bashing for chopping down too many trees (thank you anti-insult filter ?). I have an order of 15 Bundles I need to deliver this evening and I know there’s no way I’ll be able to! But hold on, weren’t we talking about an ecoSYSTEM? Yes, and like all systems, it has rules. We all know rules are there to be respected, or better still, broken… |
|
|
5 Jun 2009, 20:11
| #2
So far this sounds awesome.
Not sure about being rewarded for shaking up the ecosystem though, say my main focus for leveling was a certain monster, and that population was low so im a good boy and dont kill any of that type. But someone else comes along and just kills them. They win in everyway, Exp, Stasis rewards etc. Same for gathering/farming. Maybe i misread it, but yeah if it works like this, bad times. On a side note, if there is the same problem with kama farmers, as there is on dofus. Does this mean there wont be anything left in the f2p area. |
|
|
5 Jun 2009, 20:17
| #3
The blog-post points to the French blog for the posts by Daryl (trying the same link in the English blog just drops you back to the front section).
The equivalent posts on the English side are: Harmonising the Wakfu Flight of Stasis The Immobile Journey The Great Cosmic Omelette (something looks a bit messed up on this one) The Dead Stone Understanding the Wakfu The Green Life I hate to say this but "Stasis" is a term which means effectively stability. Which is the complete opposite of the definition used in the blog, and actually the same thing as "wakfu's" definition. QUOTE The more you undertake to bring an area into balance, the more your understanding of Wakfu will grow. Conversely, the more you work to destabilise an area, the more Stasis will flow through you. "Chaos" or just Destruction may be more appropriate as an opposite of "Wakfu". Of course "stasis" can exist if you just destroy everything, so nothing changes in the future simply because nothing exists, but the same would apply to the balance that the "Wakfu" concept is supposed to represent.Of course it's all rather ambiguous, with Wakfu (the game), Wakfu Points, and Wakfu (the "balance" concept). This post has been edited by GoldfishGod: 5 Jun 2009, 20:48 |
|
|
6 Jun 2009, 02:21
| #4
Is that purple lightsaber going to be in the Closed-Beta?
EDIT: Refering to these:
This post has been edited by GetInTheCar-IGotCandy: 6 Jun 2009, 02:22 |
|
Member
Villager |
6 Jun 2009, 08:17
| #5
Is wak-a-foo interesting me again?
|
|
|
7 Jun 2009, 04:48
| #6
they better be in the closed beta, i mean who needs a scythe when you've got a light saber. vshooom vshommmm.
![]() also goldfish just blew my mind, i dont think i was able to process anything he said. It is nice to see a new devblog update about the game though, the system is starting to shape up, lets hope the closed beta tightens up the loose ends. I am intrigued. This post has been edited by xxsevxx: 7 Jun 2009, 06:57 |
|
|
7 Jun 2009, 06:42
| #7
I hate to say this but "Stasis" is a term which means effectively stability. Which is the complete opposite of the definition used in the blog, and actually the same thing as "wakfu's" definition. "Chaos" or just Destruction may be more appropriate as an opposite of "Wakfu". Of course "stasis" can exist if you just destroy everything, so nothing changes in the future simply because nothing exists, but the same would apply to the balance that the "Wakfu" concept is supposed to represent. Ok... so to put it simply: Is there a translation you think for Wakfu? Nope! So it stayed the same in french and english. What i mean by that is that the problem being that in french, the word "stasis" does not exist! It does in english and greek though... As for all non-existing word (or game word anyway Hope it helps you! |
|
|
7 Jun 2009, 11:20
| #8
lol as always you do make the most amusing posts Talentyre...is this another Zidrune I see (and yes, that anti-insult filter IS a good thing isn't it).
Anywho, on to business. First, I am loving the organization of the ''balance sheets''. After all, the balance between groups of monsters, the balance between groups of resources and the indication of the environmental pollution really is only feasible in a 'scale' fashion. Now the balance between groups is something interesting to see when it comes to the Tofu only, or Gob only areas. Then does it come down to the subgroups (as in between say a Big Tofu and a Baby Tofu...thus if a Big Tofu is solely hunted then the scale gets skewed to chaos)? Then we come to the groupings of resources. And, well, it is explained in the greatest detail so I don't have any question, just more of a comment. I can't even imagine the system you guys have put in place to enact something like that 'Thistle' example. After all, it seems very dynamic that one plant can overgrow the system and prevent the growing of other plants altogether. This in addition to the ecosystem balance in terms of area specificity is very admirable indeed. Before delving on into 'pollution', first I want to ask one thing about the Wakfu/Stasis gauge. Now of all the things that are said of this gauge (as in the whole ''zen'' description that comes with doing what is right), is the only actual function of this bar to show our alignment towards either lawful or unlawful within the overworld? Now I do understand about the skills you will receive, etc. etc. But I just wish to know about the what level of the gauge between Wakfu and Chaos will the all-important PVP become active. After all, if the scale is all the way towards Stasis, then that seem like it is cutting it a little close due to the destruction that the person would have already done. Now this is me just blabbering for the sake of blabbering but if there is any sanity to what I just said, then feel free to explain the control system of players on players and the environment based on level. In addition, is it an absolute rule that if the resource turns 'brown/black' on the scale, they can never be brought back or is there an unmentioned skill given by having perfect Wakfu and the crystal as well to be able to bring them back (the best I saw so far is to ''balance or reorganize'' the ecosystem, not restore it. So do tell on this rather important point. Oh and how can PVP render the area that is unstable into further chaos when the PVP is happening for the sole reason to restore the balance... unless ofcourse you are talking about certain kinds of PVP but the comment does not seem to point to this so yeeeeah. And now pollution. First, I know it says that you guys have yet to fully explain it but I do have one question: With the first two types of environmental fluctuations (critters and crops), actions can be taken by other players to correct the overall environmental stability. But how is this to be done for pollution (other than the influence of the dynamic environment or the rule of the governor)? After all, if this is a direct result of crafting, then unless there is an 'anti-crafting' skill to reduce this negative influence, then the problem could get dire indeed. Wow that was a big-un. Hope you lot are still awake |
|
|
7 Jun 2009, 14:35
| #9
What i mean by that is that the problem being that in french, the word "stasis" does not exist! It does in english and greek though... The French Blog uses "Stasis", and the word itself originates from Greek/New Latin on which French is partially based. So yes, I think it does exist in a way, as much as "Sinistro" does.Of course, the french version of Google, drops you into the French version of Wikipedia, which has QUOTE (Google translation) The stasis (στάσις / stasis) is the term by which the ancient Greeks called the political crisis, moral and social results of an internal conflict in a city-state, often between the rich and less rich, especially in Athens between the Eupatrides (the "well-born") and those that aristocracy known as kakoi ( "bad", the "droppings"). It can be translated by the words of discord, civil unrest and even revolt. This makes sense in the Wakfu context.Most Greek cities saw demonstrations of the stasis in archaic and classical periods. This crisis is seen in the sources, both as a stain than a civic sedition. Its most acute is the civil war. It knows no rules or limits. This rivalry is dialectically by clashes political or civil wars, by a series of demands, victories and setbacks that summarize the history of the archaic city, tyranny and the process of democratization. Of course, it doesn't help that the word DOES exist, in one of the most well-known languages on the planet (as a concept of stability of spinning plates). So its status as a "made up word", and particular meaning, is bound to be somewhat debatable. This post has been edited by GoldfishGod: 7 Jun 2009, 15:00 |
|
|
7 Jun 2009, 15:14
| #10
Ok, i,ll admit I didn't get to the wikipédia for the information, I've looked it up in a dictionnary... Sorry to say, but i'll stick to the dictionnary instead!
And yes, the word does exist in greek. Actually, the franch word "stase" is based on it! But there doesn't appear to be the exact word "stasis". And now I am wondering why i am saying all of that since i do tend to agree that the information from qii tend to say the correct explanation for the game... :/ Don't mind me, must have been on my "writing hour" or something like that! Gold Down: hehe That is because we were having a discussion about it on the french side of the forum... and when I checked here it kindda wanted to take that direction so that is why I talked about it! This post has been edited by ElfShadow: 7 Jun 2009, 15:25 |
|
|
7 Jun 2009, 15:20
| #11
And now I am wondering why i am saying all of that since i do tend to agree that the information from qii tend to say the correct explanation for the game... :/ Don't mind me, must have been on my "writing hour" or something like that! Don't worry, I didn't even think to check what Google.fr and fr.wikipedia.com would produce when "stasis" was put in until you'd said something. Which have definitions that at least show the thinking behind the blog-post's definition. This post has been edited by GoldfishGod: 7 Jun 2009, 15:24 |
|
|
7 Jun 2009, 16:14
| #12
Talentyr just dropped some more information on the french forum answering some interrogation, gimme a sign if you want the info, i'll simply edit this message so as not to post for naught!
Edit for Zero: I just felt lazy.... didn't wanted to translate them if at least 1 person didn't seem interested! As for the where, i,ll post them here.... since it's kindda part of the devblog too! Edit2 for Zero: Just check back to make sure you needed some info on the principle of the Wakfu/Stasis bar and it,s functionning.. yeah well... I did hate having to re-read your post higer-up... gets my brain dizzy! This post has been edited by ElfShadow: 8 Jun 2009, 16:05 |
|
|
8 Jun 2009, 10:42
| #13
OOO OOO, here's the sign! lol seriously though, please feel free to post those responses as it is unlikely that the devs would answer the questions posted here (unfortunate, really). But yeah, I suppose you intend to ask each time but I for one would love it if you would post them all (those at present and those to come) at your leisure as there are undoubtedly a fair share of people who would love to see them anyway.
Oh and I suppose it is your call whether or not you wish to post the new info here or on the General Discussion forum. Not really that important of a choice but hey, might as well throw it out there. P.S. Thanks in advance. |
|
|
8 Jun 2009, 16:35
| #14
Ok, so here are the post the devs did on the french forum. Please de excuse the mistake I might have made while writing!
You will find my personnal commentary in italic. Oh! Yeah right... I’ll avoid transalting all that is non-essential for time-saving purpose. And the quote is well… just to make it clear for the presentation more than anything…. Will the Wakfu/Stasis bar change while doing dungeons? Theorically, no. Dungeons are special place without ecosystem. That does imply that we will have to be carefulk about the equilibration, etc. Wich make me think that the use of your satchel is an exception. The satchel is also a special area without it’s ecosystem but wich allow you to use crafting machines. We will make it so that the action that you perform in your satchel affects in a way or another the surrounding areas. (The next paragraph is gonna be somewhat challenging, i’ll translate it later if you don’t mind) At the beginning, your bar will be set in the middle (« neutral , gray area ») Wich mean that you are in balance between the Wakfu and the Stasis not meaning that you are currently going for the balance in an area since the two « balance » are completly different thing and are not complementary! Pollution is, and I insist on it, only Stasis because it is the result of the player using something natural to make something artificial wich isn’t included in a natural cycle. For those of you asking, recycling allow you to destroy crafted objet to cleanse it and will give you something back for doing so. You must remember that the Wakfu/Stasis bar will have a slow evolution wich will be proportional to the consequence of your action. Meaning that it’s not by crafting some object that you will end up being a complete Stasis player or by regulating the onster of one area that you will end up being SuperWakfuMan! (Yeah, he did say super WakfuMan! Now, about the neutral character, we will try to balance everything accordingly (not in accordance with the evolution bar) so that each way of playing (either being on the side of the Wakfu, the Stasis, or dead in the middle as Neutral) will be playable and fun to do so! That is all for now! Do take in mind that those are not quite definitive and may change as long as it is in devlopment! Yeah well… if you are wondering about the last paragraph, it is simply beacause they want people to feel fre not to choose to be on the Wakfu side or the Stasis side. so they are thinking way to compensate so that a Stasis player, for exemple, won’t automatically overpower a Neutral caracter. Feel free to ask question, I am not a dev, but if i can find an answer or explain it otherwise, I’ll do so! P.S. Almost forgot! Since I am mostly on the french forum, send me a PM if i've been a couple of days not to answer anything... But please... make it so that only ONE person send the PM.... I'd hate being flooded! (He is actually answering to a user post, I just did’nt fin dit… Honestly, to attain the one of the extremity of the Wakfu/Stasis bar will surely be a goal by itself but, in my opinion, that will be far from saying that the Wakfu/Stasis action of a player are over. That is without counting on the fact that this functionality is also conncted to the PvP and the politic. For exemple, depending on the governor, I am sure that some player who have already reach their maximum on their evolution bar (Yeah… i,ll name it like that for now, it,s getting pretty tiresome always writing the Wakfu/Stasis bar…. So take into account that when I say the maximum of the evolution bar, it means on either side.) will have to continue confirming that position so as not to loose their bonus to the balance (unbalance) wanted by the governor. ElfShadow : What happen if I introduce a new plant in an area ecosystem? Adding a plant in an area ecosystem wich does not already contai nit will only ad dit to it’s appropriate category : trees / plants / crops (Well… not sure for the last one how they will translate it, but that would happened to be where you’ll find wheat, barley, oats, etc.). That is why, for exemple, adding an hazelnut tree in a forest of ash will only influence the category trees. That is not the case for monster since they are split by family and introducing a new family might be possible.Thing is, the work on that is not finished, so I wouldn,t be able to confirm that last point right now. For those of you wondering about the trees / plants / crops you must refer yourself to the picture: ![]() In oder, under Ressources, you’ll find: Crops / Plants / Trees So, since the arrow is pointing down, meaning it is missing trees in the area, even in a forest of ash you can put some hazelnut tree to re-equilibrate the area. In the next edit: The story of the missing paragraph! This post has been edited by ElfShadow: 8 Jun 2009, 18:30 |
|
|
8 Jun 2009, 22:54
| #15
This game is a very complex game that I would love to try.Love the idea of Ecosystem and how we have to watch what we do just like in real life.
|
|
|
9 Jun 2009, 08:17
| #16
"We will make it so that the action that you perform in your satchel affects in a way or another the surrounding areas."
I don't especially understand that statement in regards to what you do "in your satchel" but this could just be another way of saying what people would do in the environment. If not, please feel free to correct me. "recycling allow you to destroy crafted objet to cleanse it and will give you something back for doing so." Well now this answers my question about pollution. Only I am wondering how to recycle. I figure it means to reuse the same object to make yet another object but that would still be using some resources for this purpose now wouldn't it. "You must remember that the Wakfu/Stasis bar will have a slow evolution which will be proportional to the consequence of your action. Meaning that it’s not by crafting some object that you will end up being a complete Stasis player or by regulating the monster of one area that you will end up being SuperWakfuMan!" lol yes, SuperWakfuMan is an awesome comment. And I am glad that they are making it a rather challenging thing to get to either end of the spectrum. After all, I would not want to get to Stasis just due to a lapse in judgment of what I am leveling/equipment farming on and neither do I wish to be fully 'Wakfud' just by maintaining balance. This gives something else to work for in addition to just the pure character leveling concept. "Feel free to ask question, I am not a dev, but if i can find an answer or explain it otherwise, I’ll do so!" Well other than what you have answered thus far, if you see any answers to the questions and/or comments I posted 6 messages above this last one (on '7 Jun 2009, 11:22') then please feel free to answer away "So, since the arrow is pointing down, meaning it is missing trees in the area, even in a forest of ash you can put some hazelnut tree to re-equilibrate the area." Oh, this is certainly a new piece of info that I didn't expect. I figured putting a hazelnut tree in a forest of ash would mess with the environmental stability (from the game's perspective) but it seems that the devs thought the opposite. I figure it then all has to do with moderation. So planting several hazelnut trees would destabilize the system but one is not altogether significant. This is just a guess though. |
|
|
9 Jun 2009, 17:28
| #17
"In your satchel" refers to the possibility of having crafting machines in your dimensional bag. Since using a crafting machine usually has a stasis impact on the surrounding territory the devs want to make even actions performed in your home change the outside balance.
Recycling seems to be breaking crafted objects back into their component parts or ingredients. As for hazelnut trees in an ash forest, it looks like "a tree is just a tree." Having more complex ecosystems would be awesome but time consuming to develop as they would have to track individual ecosystems. So any tree can raise the Tree category, any crop can raise the Crop category, any plant can raise the Plant category. |
|
|
10 Jun 2009, 04:55
| #18
Yeah I thought as much for all your points Eran, but I figured I'd pose the questions anyway. And hey, if I'm wrong, SO ARE YOU MWAHAHAHA...*cough* uh..moving on...
|
|
|
12 Jun 2009, 02:24
| #19
And there I was, trying to be cryptic....
Ah well! I am here for the bad news only anyway! I don't know when you'll have the official translation of the devblog article (Yeah, I won't translate that much sorry! Basically, the closed Beta will be re-schedule at an ulterior date... And no, we didn't had any clue whatsoever except for the fact that people are going to be able to test 1 of the dungeon at the AC4. |
|
|
12 Jun 2009, 05:17
| #20
hahaha well I am not even surprised anymore. I am a little put out that this info has been on the French forums but has yet to be told to us English players. And I figured that the Beta would run the whole game but (if I got your message right) we are restricted to only a very small portion of the land... oh well, even this should provide a good representation of load capabilities with the servers.
|
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 2 September 2010, 18:48 |